Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shed (video game)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:15, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Shed (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "Shed (video game)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
Article about an Xbox Live indie game that simply describes the game's features and gives a link to where the reader can buy it. Prodded per WP:GNG for having had no secondary sources since 2008; article creator opposed deletion because "I don't believe this article should be deleted. It is still publicly available." McGeddon (talk) 10:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) czar · · 15:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. There are no sources that I can find, and - given the subject - no further sources are likely to come up. Not thrilled with the spam aspect, either. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There does not seem to be much, if any, reliable sources covering this game. Satellizer el Bridget ツ 08:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not a single reliable source available in coverage. Xbox Live Indie Games are rarely notable, usually a single dev's side project or something. No hits with Shed and the dev ("Richard Lucas") either. Delete for not passing the GNG. czar · · 03:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.